Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and Its Impact in Indonesia

Fredy B.L. Tobing, Erwin Indradjaja

Abstract


This paper presents a historical and qualitative study to examine the rise of the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) as a force in international politics and its impacts on the dynamics of violent extremism threat in Indonesia. The rise of ISIS was a turning point from the nascent progressive shift toward democratization in the Arab world represented by the “Arab Spring,” and its influence has spread beyond Syria and Iraq to threaten regional and global security. Like in other countries in the Islamic world, Indonesian society and politics have been significantly affected by the activities of ISIS. In addition to describing the origin of ISIS and spread of its ideology, this paper examines the responses from Indonesian extremist and mainstream community to ISIS’ agenda. It argues that the conflicting responses primarily revolves around the notion of whether ISIS actually has qualities of a functional state. The role of moderate Islamic mass organisations such as Nahdlatul Ulama and Muhammadiyah has also proven to be important in resisting the spread of ISIS’ ideology in Indonesia.


Keywords


anti-terrorism; Indonesia; Iraq-Syria; ISIS; Islamic organizations.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, A. S. (2015). Ideologi Gerakan Pasca Reformasi. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Assad, M.H. (2014). ISIS Organisasi Teroris Paling Mengerikan Abad Ini. Jakarta : PT. Zahira Ufuk Abadi.

Bekerja Mencegah Kedzaliman. Retrieved June 26, 2016, from http://syamina.org/syamina3-Deklarasi-Daulah-Islam-Iraq-Dan-Syam.html.

Blunstchli, J.K. (2000). The Theory of the State. Ontario: Batoche Books.

Frankel, J. (1979). International Relations in a Changing World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Husain, M. (2014). ”Fenomena ISIS sebagai Ancaman Mental bagi Umat Umat Islam di Indonesia.” Nonseminar paper, University of Indonesia, Indonesia.

Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2014a), “Indonesians and the Syrian Conflict” IPAC Report No. 6.

Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2014b), “The Evolution of ISIS in Indonesia” IPAC Report No. 13.

Institute for Policy Analysis of Conflict (2015), “Support for ‘Islamic State’ in Indonesian Prisons”, IPAC Report No. 15.

ISIS Berperang Bagai Sebuah Negara. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from http://www.antaranews.com/berita/497645/bahaya-besar-isis-mencekik-irak-dan-suriah.

ISIS Punya Target Menguasasi Kerajaan Yordania. Retrieved July 7, 2016, from https://www.intelijen. co.id/isis-punya-target-menguasasi-kerajaan-yordania/.

Jackson, R. dan Sorensen, G, (2013). Introduction to International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lawson, S. (2015). Contending Approaches to World Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Margulies, P. (2013). “Networks in Non-International Armed Conflicts: Crossing Borders and Defining ‘Organized Armed Group.’” International Legal Studies, 89, p. 54-76.

Muhammad, R. (2014). ISIS Mengungkap Fakta Terorisme Berlabel Islam. Jakarta: Noura Books.

Negara Islam Iraq dan Syam. Rretrieved January 26th, 2016 from http://www.wikiwand.com/ms/.

Sejarah ISIS Asal Mula & Deklarasi Khilafah-Siapa, retrieved June 28, 2015, from http://www. bebibums. com/2014/08/sejarah-isis-asal-mula-deklarasi.html.

Siapa sebenarnya ISIS itu? Dan Sebenarnya Apa Misinya Mereka? Retrieved February 1, 2016, from http://microcyber2.blogspot.co.id/2014/09/siapa-sebenarnya-isis-itu-dan-apa-misi.html.

Special Report-The Islamic State. Retrieved June 28, 2016, from http://www.calrionproject.org/.

Tim Riset Majelis Tinggi Urusan Islam Mesir. (2015). Ensiklopedi Aliran dan Mazhab dalam Dunia Islam. (Translated by Masturi Irham, Muhammad Abidun Zuhdi, Kaliffurahman Fath). Jakarta: Pustaka Al Kautsar.

What is “Islamic State”? Retrieved May 16, 2015, from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-29052144.

What is the Levant? Retrieved June 28, 2015, from http://www.dawn.com/news/1113209.

Watkin, K. (2010). “Opportunity Lost: Organized Armed Groups and The ICRC Direct Participation in Hostile Interpretive Guidance.” New York University Journal of International Law & Politics, 42(3), p. 641-695.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v21i1.365

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.