Analisis Teori Offense-Defense Pada Reformasi Kebijakan Pertahanan Jepang Dalam Dinamika Keamanan Di Asia Timur

Fadhil Alghifari, Raja Nathania Olga Letticia

Abstract


This paper will seek to demonstrate how the use of Offense-Defense Theory can best explain the Japan’s new defense reform legislation that enables the country to play a more comprehensive global security role commensurate with its capabilities, resources, national interests, and international responsibilities. Through this offense-defense lens, it will be argued that Japan’s new defense reform legislation is a response to the growing dominance of ‘offensive’ behaviour by the neighbouring countries in East Asia. This paper will then elaborate more about the elements that are used in the offense-defense theory to analyze the ‘offense’ dominance that prompts East Asian states behave aggressively and defensively including Japan. Furthermore, this paper will explain why Japan is currently playing the ‘defensive’ role to counter the growing dominance of ‘offense’ in East Asia through the four variables of offense-defense balance; military doctrine and technology, geographical considerations, social and political order, and diplomatic arrangements. Thus, we will see that Japan holds the key to the offense-defense and security balance in the increasingly hostile environment in East Asia.


Keywords


Offense-defense theory; Japan; defense reform'; security and defense; East Asia

References


Akavia, G. (1999, Februari 10). The Offense-Defense Balance: Why Better Theory Leads to Worse History. Dipetik Desember 22, 2015, dari MIT Security Studies Program: http://web.mit.edu/SSP/seminars/wed_archives99spring/akavia.html

BBC News. (2012, Desember 16). Japan election: Shinzo Abe and LDP in sweeping win - exit poll. Dipetik Desember 21, 2015, dari BBC: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-20745165

Chanlett-Avery, E., & Rinehart, I. E. (2016, Februari 9). The U.S.-Japan Alliance. Dipetik Februari 28, 2016, dari Congressional Research Service: https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/row/RL33740.pdf

Cook, M. (2014, Januari 31). Northeast Asia's Turbulent Triangle: Korea-China-Japan Relations. Dipetik November 10, 2015, dari Lowy Institute for International Policy: https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/northeast-asias-turbulent-triangle-korea-china-japan-relations

Cordesman, A. H., Burke, A., & Hammond, R. (2010, September 14). The Military Balance in Asia: 1990-2010 - a Quantitative Analysis. Dipetik September 7, 2015, dari Center for Strategic and International Studies: http://csis.org/files/publication/100914_AsiaMilitaryBalance2010.pdf

GeoCurrents. (2015, Mei 13). Disputed Island in East Asia Sea. Dipetik Desember 21, 2015, dari GeoCurrents: http://www.geocurrents.info/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/Disputed-Islands-in-the-East-Asian-Seas-1024x761.png

Glaser, C., & Kauffman, C. (1998). What is the offense-defense balance and can we measure it? International Security, 44-82.

Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation under Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167-214.

Kementerian Luar Negeri Jepang. (2014, November 7). 2014 U.S. Poll on Opinions toward Japan. Dipetik Desember 22, 2015, dari Ministry of Foreign Affairs: http://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000061649.pdf

Sekiguchi, T. (2012, Desember 13). Japan Opposition Maintains Lead. Dipetik Desember 22, 2015, dari The Wall Street Journal: http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424127887324024004578170934067846010

Shad, H. (2015, Februari 24). Japan’s Military Future: A Realist Perspective. Dipetik Desember 21, 2015, dari The Gate: http://uchicagogate.com/articles/2015/2/24/japans-military-future-a-realist-perspective/

Spitzer, K. (2012, Desember 13). Election Set to Boost Japan’s Military — Honestly. Dipetik Desember 21, 2015, dari Time: http://nation.time.com/2012/12/13/election-set-to-boost-japans-military-honestly

Teslik, L. H. (2006, April 13). Japan and Its Military. Dipetik November 10, 2015, dari Council on Foreign Relations: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/japan-and-its-military

Van Evera, S. (1998). Offense, Defense, and the Causes of War. International Security, 22(4), 5-43.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.7454/global.v18i1.45

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.